Current:Home > Contact'The Washington Post' will cut 240 jobs through voluntary buyouts -RiskRadar
'The Washington Post' will cut 240 jobs through voluntary buyouts
View
Date:2025-04-13 19:04:41
The Washington Post plans to cut 240 jobs, or almost 10% of its workforce, through voluntary buyouts, the company announced Tuesday.
The Post had been "overly optimistic" about its growth in readership, subscriptions and ads for the past two years, interim CEO Patty Stonesifer wrote in an email to staff. "We are working to find ways to return our business to a healthier place in the coming year."
Stonesifer said voluntary buyouts would be offered to employees in specific roles. She did not list which roles.
"To be clear, we designed this program to reduce our workforce by approximately 240 employees in the hopes of averting more difficult actions such as layoffs – a situation we are united in trying to avoid," she said.
This is the second — and much larger — reduction in staff at The Post this year. In January, it eliminated its Sunday magazine and a handful of jobs elsewhere in the company, which is owned by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos. (The Post itself has reported that 50 jobs were eliminated.)
Publisher Fred Ryan left in June following questions of his handling of the newspaper's finances, strife with the Post's labor unions and reported tensions with Executive Editor Sally Buzbee, whom Bezos hired in 2021.
This has been a tough year across the media industry. NPR laid off nearly 10% of its staff this spring, citing a projected revenue shortfall. Other media outlets that announced steep layoffs include Gannett, CNN, The Los Angeles Times and Vox Media.
Stonesifer said the Post would share more details with staff in a meeting on Wednesday morning.
veryGood! (84)
Related
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- Horoscopes Today, November 26, 2023
- Dolly Parton's cheerleader outfit can teach us all a lesson on ageism
- Is it better to take Social Security at 62 or 67? It depends.
- Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
- Chad Michael Murray Responds to Accusation He Cheated on Erin Foster With Sophia Bush
- The Falcons are the NFL's iffiest division leader. They have nothing to apologize for.
- Ecuador’s newly sworn-in president repeals guidelines allowing people to carry limited drug amounts
- Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
- What to set your thermostat to in the winter, more tips to lower your heating bills
Ranking
- Arkansas State Police probe death of woman found after officer
- Tom Brady Shares Glimpse of Tropical Vacation With His and Gisele Bündchen's Kids
- Josh Allen, Bills left to contemplate latest heartbreak in a season of setbacks
- Spain announces a 1.4 billion-euro deal to help protect the prized Doñana wetland from drying up
- Average rate on 30
- Celebrities, politicians among those named in sex abuse suits filed under NY’s Adult Survivors Act
- Wilders ally overseeing first stage of Dutch coalition-building quits over fraud allegation
- Tatreez is a testament to the resilience and creativity of Palestinian women
Recommendation
'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
5-year-old girl dies, search suspended for man swept out by California wave: Coast Guard
When do babies typically start walking? How to help them get there.
Colorado's Shedeur Sanders was nation's most-sacked QB. He has broken back to show for it.
As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
Natalie Portman on children working in entertainment: 'I don't believe that kids should work'
Second group of Hamas-held hostages released after hours-long delay; temporary cease-fire holds
Is it better to take Social Security at 62 or 67? It depends.