Current:Home > MyMissouri Supreme Court hears case on latest effort to block Planned Parenthood funding -RiskRadar
Missouri Supreme Court hears case on latest effort to block Planned Parenthood funding
View
Date:2025-04-15 15:47:45
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — The Missouri Attorney General’s Office defended the Republican-led Legislature’s latest attempt in a years-long struggle to block taxpayer dollars from going to Planned Parenthood during arguments before the state Supreme Court on Wednesday.
Republican Attorney General Andrew Bailey’s office had appealed after a lower court judge found it was unconstitutional for lawmakers in 2022 to specify that Planned Parenthood would get zero dollars for providing family planning services to Medicaid patients despite reimbursing other health care providers for similar treatments.
Solicitor General Josh Divine told Supreme Court judges that creating a state budget is a core power granted to lawmakers. Divine said if the high court rules in favor of Planned Parenthood in this case, it will “wreck the appropriation process that has been used for decades.”
Chuck Hatfield, Planned Parenthood’s lawyer, told judges that’s “not so.” He said the case is “one in a long line of discussions about legislative authority” to budget without trampling constitutional rights and state laws.
Missouri banned almost all abortions when the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June 2022. And before then, the state’s Medicaid program also did not reimburse for abortions.
But Planned Parenthood had previously been repaid by the state for other medical procedures for low-income patients. The group said in March 2022, when it sued the state, that Missouri was ending reimbursements for birth control, cancer screenings, sexually transmitted disease testing and treatment, and other non-abortion care.
Abortion opponents in Missouri have for years sought to stop any taxpayer money from going to Planned Parenthood. But legislators struggled with “loopholes” that allowed Planned Parenthood clinics that provide other health care to continue receiving funding.
Lawmakers were able to stop money from going to Planned Parenthood in the 2019 fiscal year by forgoing some federal funding to avoid requirements that the clinics be reimbursed if low-income patients go there for birth control, cancer screenings and other preventative care. Missouri instead used state money to pay for those services.
But the Missouri Supreme Court in 2020 ruled lawmakers violated the constitution by making the policy change through the state budget, forcing the state to reimburse Planned Parenthood for health care provided to Medicaid patients.
“There has never been any dispute that the Legislature can constitutionally restrict Medicaid funds from Planned Parenthood if it wants to do so, it just has to go through the proper procedures,” Divine said during Wednesday arguments.
Missouri Supreme Court judges did not indicate when they might rule on the latest defunding effort.
Wednesday marked the first Supreme Court arguments heard by Judge Ginger Gooch, who was appointed by Republican Missouri Gov. Mike Parson in October. With Gooch and newly appointed Judge Kelly Broniec, women have a majority on the state Supreme Court for the first time in history.
veryGood! (8)
Related
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- As police lose the war on crime in South Africa, private security companies step in
- What sets Ravens apart from rest of NFL? For one, enviable depth to weather injuries
- A timeline of key moments leading to Japan planes colliding. Human error is seen as a possible cause
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
- Winter storm could have you driving in the snow again. These tips can help keep you safe.
- Third batch of Epstein documents unsealed in ongoing release of court filings
- Massive vehicle pileup on southern California highway leaves 2 dead, 9 injured, authorities say
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- Why Kelly Clarkson Doesn't Allow Her Kids on Social Media
Ranking
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- Prominent Black church in New York sued for gender bias by woman who sought to be its senior pastor
- Why Kelly Clarkson Doesn't Allow Her Kids on Social Media
- Resurrected Golden Globes will restart the party with ‘Barbie,’ ‘Oppenheimer’ and Swift
- NHL in ASL returns, delivering American Sign Language analysis for Deaf community at Winter Classic
- FAA orders temporary grounding of certain Boeing planes after Alaska Airlines door detaches midflight
- Olympian Mary Lou Retton Speaks Out About Her Life-Threatening Health Scare in First Interview
- Two hikers on snowshoes, hit by avalanche in Italian Alps near Switzerland, are dead, rescuers say
Recommendation
Have Dry, Sensitive Skin? You Need To Add These Gentle Skincare Products to Your Routine
As EPA Looks Toward Negotiations Over Mobile, Alabama, Coal Ash Site, Federal Judge Dismisses Environmental Lawsuit on Technical Grounds
Why Eva Mendes Likely Won't Join Barbie’s Ryan Gosling on Golden Globes Red Carpet
The Bloodcurdling True Story Behind Killers of the Flower Moon
Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
Winter storms dump snow on both US coasts and make for hazardous travel. See photos of the aftermath
South Korea says the North has again fired artillery shells near their sea border
Judge blocks Trump lawyers from arguing about columnist’s rape claim at upcoming defamation trial